Difference between revisions of "Zeta-function method for regularization"
(Importing text file) |
|||
(22 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{MSC|11M|58G}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
''zeta-function regularization'' | ''zeta-function regularization'' | ||
− | Regularization and renormalization procedures are essential issues in contemporary physics — without which it would simply not exist, at least in the form known today (2000). They are also essential in supersymmetry calculations. Among the different methods, zeta-function regularization — which is obtained by [[Analytic continuation|analytic continuation]] in the complex plane of the zeta-function of the relevant physical operator in each case — might well be the most beautiful of all. Use of this method yields, for instance, the vacuum energy corresponding to a quantum physical system (with constraints of any kind, in principle). Assuming the corresponding Hamiltonian operator, | + | Regularization and renormalization procedures are essential issues in contemporary physics — without which it would simply not exist, at least in the form known today (2000). They are also essential in supersymmetry calculations. Among the different methods, zeta-function regularization — which is obtained by |
+ | [[Analytic continuation|analytic continuation]] in the complex plane of the zeta-function of the relevant physical operator in each case — might well be the most beautiful of all. Use of this method yields, for instance, the vacuum energy corresponding to a quantum physical system (with constraints of any kind, in principle). Assuming the corresponding Hamiltonian operator, $H$, has a spectral decomposition of the form (think, as simplest case, of a quantum harmonic oscillator): $\{\def\l{\lambda}\l_i,\phi_i\}_{i\in I}$, with $I$ some set of indices (which can be discrete, continuous, mixed, multiple, etc.), then the quantum vacuum energy is obtained as follows | ||
+ | {{Cite|ElOdRoByZe}}, | ||
+ | {{Cite|El2}}: | ||
+ | |||
+ | $\def\phi{\varphi}$ | ||
+ | $$\sum_{i\in I}(\phi_i,H\phi_i) = {\rm tr}\; H = \sum_{i\in I}\l_i = \sum_{i\in I}\l_i^{-s}\Big|_{s=-1} = \zeta_H(-1), $$ | ||
+ | |||
− | + | where $\zeta_H$ is the zeta-function corresponding to the operator $H$. The formal sum over the eigenvalues is usually ill-defined, and the last step involves analytic continuation, inherent to the definition of the zeta-function itself. These mathematically simple-looking relations involve very deep physical concepts (no wonder that understanding them took several decades in the recent history of | |
+ | [[Quantum field theory|quantum field theory]], QFT). The zeta-function method is unchallenged at the one-loop level, where it is rigorously defined and where many calculations of QFT reduce basically (from a mathematical point of view) to the computation of determinants of elliptic pseudo-differential operators ($\Psi$DOs, cf. also | ||
+ | [[Pseudo-differential operator|Pseudo-differential operator]]) | ||
+ | {{Cite|El}}. It is thus no surprise that the preferred definition of the determinant for such operators is obtained through the corresponding zeta-function. | ||
− | + | When one comes to specific calculations, the zeta-function regularization method relies on the existence of simple formulas for obtaining the analytic continuation above. These consist of the reflection formula of the corresponding zeta-function in each case, together with some other fundamental expressions, as the Jacobi theta-function identity, Poisson's resummation formula and the famous Chowla–Selberg formula | |
+ | {{Cite|El}}. However, some of these formulas are restricted to very specific zeta-functions, and it often turned out that for some physically important cases the corresponding formulas did not exist in the literature. This has required a painful process (it has taken over a decade already) of generalization of previous results and derivation of new expressions of this kind | ||
+ | {{Cite|ElOdRoByZe}}, | ||
+ | {{Cite|El2}}. | ||
+ | {{Cite|ByCoVaZe}}. | ||
− | + | Based on methods of Elizalde {{Cite|El2}},zeta regularization can also be generalized to regularize divergent integrals , so we can regularize the UV divergences in QFT theories | |
− | + | $$\begin{array}{l} | |
+ | \int\nolimits_{a}^{\infty }x^{m-s} dx =\frac{m-s}{2} \int\nolimits_{a}^{\infty }x^{m-1-s} dx +\zeta (s-m)-\sum\limits_{i=1}^{a}i^{m-s} +a^{m-s} \\ | ||
+ | -\sum\limits_{r=1}^{\infty }\frac{B_{2r} \Gamma (m-s+1)}{(2r)!\Gamma (m-2r+2-s)} (m-2r+1-s)\int\nolimits_{a}^{\infty }x^{m-2r-s} dx \end{array} $$ | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | + | {| | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |valign="top"|{{Ref|ByCoVaZe}}||valign="top"| A.A. Bytsenko, G. Cognola, L. Vanzo, S. Zerbini, "Quantum fields and extended objects in space-times with constant curvature spatial section" ''Phys. Rept.'', '''266''' (1996) pp. 1–126 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |valign="top"|{{Ref|El}}||valign="top"| E. Elizalde, "Multidimensional extension of the generalized Chowla–Selberg formula" ''Commun. Math. Phys.'', '''198''' (1998) pp. 83–95 {{MR|1657369}} | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |valign="top"|{{Ref|El2}}||valign="top"| E. Elizalde, "Ten physical applications of spectral zeta functions", Springer (1995) {{MR|1448403}} | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |valign="top"|{{Ref|ElOdRoByZe}}||valign="top"| E. Elizalde, S.D. Odintsov, A. Romeo, A.A. Bytsenko, S. Zerbini, "Zeta regularization techniques with applications", World Sci. (1994) {{MR|1346490}} | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |valign="top"|{{Ref|Ha}}||valign="top"| S.W. Hawking, "Zeta function regularization of path integrals in curved space time" ''Commun. Math. Phys.'', '''55''' (1977) pp. 133–148 {{MR|0524257}} | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |valign="top"|{{Ref|Na}}||valign="top"| M. Nakahara, "Geometry, topology, and physics", Inst. Phys. (1995) pp. 7–8 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} |
Latest revision as of 23:03, 29 December 2015
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 11M Secondary: 58G [MSN][ZBL]
zeta-function regularization
Regularization and renormalization procedures are essential issues in contemporary physics — without which it would simply not exist, at least in the form known today (2000). They are also essential in supersymmetry calculations. Among the different methods, zeta-function regularization — which is obtained by analytic continuation in the complex plane of the zeta-function of the relevant physical operator in each case — might well be the most beautiful of all. Use of this method yields, for instance, the vacuum energy corresponding to a quantum physical system (with constraints of any kind, in principle). Assuming the corresponding Hamiltonian operator, $H$, has a spectral decomposition of the form (think, as simplest case, of a quantum harmonic oscillator): $\{\def\l{\lambda}\l_i,\phi_i\}_{i\in I}$, with $I$ some set of indices (which can be discrete, continuous, mixed, multiple, etc.), then the quantum vacuum energy is obtained as follows [ElOdRoByZe], [El2]:
$\def\phi{\varphi}$ $$\sum_{i\in I}(\phi_i,H\phi_i) = {\rm tr}\; H = \sum_{i\in I}\l_i = \sum_{i\in I}\l_i^{-s}\Big|_{s=-1} = \zeta_H(-1), $$
where $\zeta_H$ is the zeta-function corresponding to the operator $H$. The formal sum over the eigenvalues is usually ill-defined, and the last step involves analytic continuation, inherent to the definition of the zeta-function itself. These mathematically simple-looking relations involve very deep physical concepts (no wonder that understanding them took several decades in the recent history of
quantum field theory, QFT). The zeta-function method is unchallenged at the one-loop level, where it is rigorously defined and where many calculations of QFT reduce basically (from a mathematical point of view) to the computation of determinants of elliptic pseudo-differential operators ($\Psi$DOs, cf. also
Pseudo-differential operator)
[El]. It is thus no surprise that the preferred definition of the determinant for such operators is obtained through the corresponding zeta-function.
When one comes to specific calculations, the zeta-function regularization method relies on the existence of simple formulas for obtaining the analytic continuation above. These consist of the reflection formula of the corresponding zeta-function in each case, together with some other fundamental expressions, as the Jacobi theta-function identity, Poisson's resummation formula and the famous Chowla–Selberg formula [El]. However, some of these formulas are restricted to very specific zeta-functions, and it often turned out that for some physically important cases the corresponding formulas did not exist in the literature. This has required a painful process (it has taken over a decade already) of generalization of previous results and derivation of new expressions of this kind [ElOdRoByZe], [El2]. [ByCoVaZe].
Based on methods of Elizalde [El2],zeta regularization can also be generalized to regularize divergent integrals , so we can regularize the UV divergences in QFT theories
$$\begin{array}{l} \int\nolimits_{a}^{\infty }x^{m-s} dx =\frac{m-s}{2} \int\nolimits_{a}^{\infty }x^{m-1-s} dx +\zeta (s-m)-\sum\limits_{i=1}^{a}i^{m-s} +a^{m-s} \\ -\sum\limits_{r=1}^{\infty }\frac{B_{2r} \Gamma (m-s+1)}{(2r)!\Gamma (m-2r+2-s)} (m-2r+1-s)\int\nolimits_{a}^{\infty }x^{m-2r-s} dx \end{array} $$
References
[ByCoVaZe] | A.A. Bytsenko, G. Cognola, L. Vanzo, S. Zerbini, "Quantum fields and extended objects in space-times with constant curvature spatial section" Phys. Rept., 266 (1996) pp. 1–126 |
[El] | E. Elizalde, "Multidimensional extension of the generalized Chowla–Selberg formula" Commun. Math. Phys., 198 (1998) pp. 83–95 MR1657369 |
[El2] | E. Elizalde, "Ten physical applications of spectral zeta functions", Springer (1995) MR1448403 |
[ElOdRoByZe] | E. Elizalde, S.D. Odintsov, A. Romeo, A.A. Bytsenko, S. Zerbini, "Zeta regularization techniques with applications", World Sci. (1994) MR1346490 |
[Ha] | S.W. Hawking, "Zeta function regularization of path integrals in curved space time" Commun. Math. Phys., 55 (1977) pp. 133–148 MR0524257 |
[Na] | M. Nakahara, "Geometry, topology, and physics", Inst. Phys. (1995) pp. 7–8 |
Zeta-function method for regularization. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Zeta-function_method_for_regularization&oldid=13101