Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Talk:First integral"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(thank you)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
In chapter 2 section 10.5, page 125, Arnol'd explains this subject very clearly.
 
In chapter 2 section 10.5, page 125, Arnol'd explains this subject very clearly.
  
:Thank you. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 19:28, 14 January 2015 (CET)
+
:Thank you.
 +
:And please sign your messages (on talk pages) by four tildas: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 19:28, 14 January 2015 (CET)
 +
 
 +
:Well, I've added "Ordinary Differential Equations". However, I did not remove "Mathematical methods of classical mechanics", since I am not sure: maybe [[User:Camillo.delellis|Camillo Delellis]] added it in relation to (say) Hamilton systems rather that first integrals in general. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 19:42, 15 January 2015 (CET)
 +
 
 +
::Indeed, the reference was meant in relation to Hamiltonian systems. [[User:Camillo.delellis|Camillo]] ([[User talk:Camillo.delellis|talk]]) 15:37, 17 January 2015 (CET)

Latest revision as of 14:37, 17 January 2015

The reference to Arnol'd is a bit misleading. Indeed Arnol'd writes about first integrals, but not in particular in the referenced book. A much better reference would be his book titled Ordinary Differential Equations. Consider as a reference: Arnol'd, V.I., Ordinary Differential Equations (New York, 1992)

In chapter 2 section 10.5, page 125, Arnol'd explains this subject very clearly.

Thank you.
And please sign your messages (on talk pages) by four tildas: ~~~~. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 19:28, 14 January 2015 (CET)
Well, I've added "Ordinary Differential Equations". However, I did not remove "Mathematical methods of classical mechanics", since I am not sure: maybe Camillo Delellis added it in relation to (say) Hamilton systems rather that first integrals in general. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 19:42, 15 January 2015 (CET)
Indeed, the reference was meant in relation to Hamiltonian systems. Camillo (talk) 15:37, 17 January 2015 (CET)
How to Cite This Entry:
First integral. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=First_integral&oldid=36261