Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Absolutely continuous measures"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(not by you?)
(ah, yes, by Camillo :-))
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:But I do not understand, why at all the "- $\nu_a$" ? It seems, it was added by you; really? What does it mean? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 18:27, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
 
:But I do not understand, why at all the "- $\nu_a$" ? It seems, it was added by you; really? What does it mean? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 18:27, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
 
:: not added by me --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 20:12, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
 
:: not added by me --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 20:12, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
::: But I do not see it in the original article. --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 21:20, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
 
 
: Maybe the following is meant:
 
: Maybe the following is meant:
 
where
 
where

Revision as of 19:23, 30 July 2012

Should - $\nu_a$ be $-\nu_a$ here? (a hyphen in text mode is a hyphen, it is only a minus in math mode) --Jjg 20:12, 30 July 2012 (CEST)

But I do not understand, why at all the "- $\nu_a$" ? It seems, it was added by you; really? What does it mean? --Boris Tsirelson 18:27, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
not added by me --Jjg 20:12, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
Maybe the following is meant:

where

  • $\nu_a$ is absolutey continuous with respect to $\mu$;
  • $\nu_s$ is singular with respect to $\mu$
--Boris Tsirelson 18:34, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
Yes, I think this is stray punctuation (as in the endashes used in French "bullet points" but which has ended up inline), I was just looking at this in "TeX error mode" and not reading the maths, ... --Jjg 20:12, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
The math is always worth reading... at least by authors :-) --Boris Tsirelson 21:18, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
How to Cite This Entry:
Absolutely continuous measures. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Absolutely_continuous_measures&oldid=27272