Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Absolute continuity"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Why not)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
: Why not? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 13:21, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
 
: Why not? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 13:21, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
 +
: Fine by me [[User:Camillo.delellis|Camillo]] 14:08, 30 July 2012 (CEST)

Revision as of 13:08, 30 July 2012

I moved some portions of the old article in Signed measure. I have not had the time to add all Mathscinet and Zentralblatt references. Camillo 22:54, 29 July 2012 (CEST)

Could I suggest using $\lambda$ rather than $\mathcal L$ for Lebesgue measure since

  • it is very commonly used, almost standard
  • it would be consistent with the notation for a general measure, $\mu$
  • calligraphic is being used already for $\sigma$-algebras

--Jjg 12:57, 30 July 2012 (CEST)

Why not? --Boris Tsirelson 13:21, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
Fine by me Camillo 14:08, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
How to Cite This Entry:
Absolute continuity. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Absolute_continuity&oldid=27247