Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Dixmier mapping"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
m (MR/ZBL numbers added)
m (AUTOMATIC EDIT (latexlist): Replaced 91 formulas out of 91 by TEX code with an average confidence of 2.0 and a minimal confidence of 2.0.)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<!--This article has been texified automatically. Since there was no Nroff source code for this article,
 +
the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist
 +
was used.
 +
If the TeX and formula formatting is correct, please remove this message and the {{TEX|semi-auto}} category.
 +
 +
Out of 91 formulas, 91 were replaced by TEX code.-->
 +
 +
{{TEX|semi-auto}}{{TEX|done}}
 
''Dixmier map''
 
''Dixmier map''
  
 
A mapping first defined for nilpotent Lie algebras by J. Dixmier in 1963 [[#References|[a6]]], based on the [[Orbit method|orbit method]] of A.A. Kirillov [[#References|[a12]]]. In 1966, Dixmier extended his definition to solvable Lie algebras [[#References|[a7]]] (here and below, all Lie algebras are of finite dimension over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, cf. also [[Lie algebra|Lie algebra]]; [[Lie algebra, solvable|Lie algebra, solvable]]).
 
A mapping first defined for nilpotent Lie algebras by J. Dixmier in 1963 [[#References|[a6]]], based on the [[Orbit method|orbit method]] of A.A. Kirillov [[#References|[a12]]]. In 1966, Dixmier extended his definition to solvable Lie algebras [[#References|[a7]]] (here and below, all Lie algebras are of finite dimension over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, cf. also [[Lie algebra|Lie algebra]]; [[Lie algebra, solvable|Lie algebra, solvable]]).
  
The Dixmier mapping is an equivariant mapping with respect to the adjoint [[Algebraic group|algebraic group]] <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d1202401.png" /> from the dual space <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d1202402.png" /> of a solvable Lie algebra <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d1202403.png" /> into the space of primitive ideals of the enveloping algebra <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d1202404.png" /> of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d1202405.png" /> (cf. also [[Universal enveloping algebra|Universal enveloping algebra]]; the adjoint algebraic group <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d1202406.png" /> of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d1202407.png" /> is the smallest algebraic subgroup of the group of automorphisms of the Lie algebra <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d1202408.png" /> whose Lie algebra in the algebra of endomorphisms of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d1202409.png" /> contains the adjoint Lie algebra of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024010.png" />). All ideals of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024011.png" /> are stable under the action of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024012.png" />.
+
The Dixmier mapping is an equivariant mapping with respect to the adjoint [[Algebraic group|algebraic group]] $G$ from the dual space $\mathfrak{g} ^ { * }$ of a solvable Lie algebra $\frak g$ into the space of primitive ideals of the enveloping algebra $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ of $\frak g$ (cf. also [[Universal enveloping algebra|Universal enveloping algebra]]; the adjoint algebraic group $G$ of $\frak g$ is the smallest algebraic subgroup of the group of automorphisms of the Lie algebra $\frak g$ whose Lie algebra in the algebra of endomorphisms of $\frak g$ contains the adjoint Lie algebra of $\frak g$). All ideals of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ are stable under the action of $G$.
  
The properties of the Dixmier mapping have been studied in detail. In particular, the Dixmier mapping allows one to describe (the) primitive ideals of the enveloping algebra <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024013.png" /> and to describe the centre of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024014.png" />.
+
The properties of the Dixmier mapping have been studied in detail. In particular, the Dixmier mapping allows one to describe (the) primitive ideals of the enveloping algebra $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ and to describe the centre of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$.
  
The dual <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024015.png" /> of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024016.png" /> is equipped with the [[Zariski topology|Zariski topology]] and the space of primitive ideals of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024017.png" /> with the Jacobson topology.
+
The dual $\mathfrak{g} ^ { * }$ of $\frak g$ is equipped with the [[Zariski topology|Zariski topology]] and the space of primitive ideals of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ with the Jacobson topology.
  
The Dixmier mapping (for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024018.png" /> solvable) is surjective [[#References|[a9]]], injective (modulo the action of the adjoint algebraic group <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024019.png" />) [[#References|[a17]]], continuous [[#References|[a5]]], and even open [[#References|[a13]]].
+
The Dixmier mapping (for $\frak g$ solvable) is surjective [[#References|[a9]]], injective (modulo the action of the adjoint algebraic group $G$) [[#References|[a17]]], continuous [[#References|[a5]]], and even open [[#References|[a13]]].
  
Hence the Dixmier mapping induces a homeomorphism between <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024020.png" /> and the space <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024021.png" /> of primitive ideals of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024022.png" /> and allows a complete classification of the primitive ideals of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024023.png" />. The openness was an open question for quite a long while.
+
Hence the Dixmier mapping induces a homeomorphism between $\mathfrak { g } ^ { * } / G$ and the space $\operatorname{Prim}( U ( \mathfrak{g} ) )$ of primitive ideals of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ and allows a complete classification of the primitive ideals of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$. The openness was an open question for quite a long while.
  
The Dixmier construction goes as follows: If <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024024.png" /> is a linear form on the Lie algebra <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024025.png" />, one chooses a subalgebra <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024026.png" /> of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024027.png" /> which is a polarization of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024028.png" />. This means that the subalgebra <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024029.png" /> is an isotropic subspace of maximal dimension for the skew-symmetric bilinear form <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024030.png" /> (on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024031.png" />); hence the dimension of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024032.png" /> is one half of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024033.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024034.png" /> is the [[Stabilizer|stabilizer]] of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024035.png" /> in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024036.png" /> with respect to the co-adjoint action of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024037.png" /> in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024038.png" />.
+
The Dixmier construction goes as follows: If $f$ is a linear form on the Lie algebra $\frak g$, one chooses a subalgebra $\mathfrak h $ of $\frak g$ which is a polarization of $f$. This means that the subalgebra $\mathfrak h $ is an isotropic subspace of maximal dimension for the skew-symmetric bilinear form $f ( [ \cdot , \cdot ] )$ (on $\frak g$); hence the dimension of $\mathfrak h $ is one half of $\operatorname { dim } \mathfrak { g } - \operatorname { dim } \mathfrak { g } ( f )$, where $\mathfrak { g } ( f )$ is the [[Stabilizer|stabilizer]] of $f$ in $\frak g$ with respect to the co-adjoint action of $\frak g$ in $\mathfrak{g} ^ { * }$.
  
For solvable Lie algebras such polarizations always exist, whereas for arbitrary Lie algebras this is, in general, not the case. Let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024039.png" /> denote the linear form on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024040.png" /> defined as the trace of the adjoint action of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024041.png" /> in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024042.png" />. The linear form <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024043.png" /> on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024044.png" /> defines a one-dimensional representation of the enveloping algebra <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024045.png" />. Let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024046.png" /> denote its kernel and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024047.png" /> the largest two-sided ideal in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024048.png" /> contained in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024049.png" />. This is nothing else but the kernel of the so-called twisted induction from <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024050.png" /> to <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024051.png" /> of the one-dimensional representation of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024052.png" /> given by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024053.png" />. In the case of a nilpotent Lie algebra, the twist <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024054.png" /> is zero. The twisted induction on the level of enveloping algebras corresponds to the unitary induction on the level of Lie groups.
+
For solvable Lie algebras such polarizations always exist, whereas for arbitrary Lie algebras this is, in general, not the case. Let $\operatorname{tr}$ denote the linear form on $\mathfrak h $ defined as the trace of the adjoint action of $\mathfrak h $ in $\mathfrak{g}/\mathfrak{h}$. The linear form $f + 1 / 2 \operatorname{tr}$ on $\mathfrak h $ defines a one-dimensional representation of the enveloping algebra $U ( \mathfrak{h} )$. Let $J$ denote its kernel and $I ( f , \mathfrak{h} )$ the largest two-sided ideal in $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ contained in $U ( {\frak g} ) J$. This is nothing else but the kernel of the so-called twisted induction from $U ( \mathfrak{h} )$ to $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ of the one-dimensional representation of $U ( \mathfrak{h} )$ given by $f$. In the case of a nilpotent Lie algebra, the twist $1 / 2 \operatorname{tr}$ is zero. The twisted induction on the level of enveloping algebras corresponds to the unitary induction on the level of Lie groups.
  
The ideal <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024055.png" /> obtained (in the solvable case) in this way is independent of the choice of the polarization [[#References|[a7]]], hence this ideal may be denoted by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024056.png" />. The ideal <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024057.png" /> is a (left) primitive ideal, i.e. the annihilator of an irreducible representation (left module) of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024058.png" />. It is known that for enveloping algebras of Lie algebras, left and right primitive ideals coincide (see [[#References|[a7]]] in the solvable case and [[#References|[a14]]] in the general case). It should be noted that for solvable Lie algebras <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024059.png" /> all prime ideals (hence especially all primitive ideals) of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024060.png" /> are completely prime [[#References|[a7]]].
+
The ideal $I ( f , \mathfrak{h} )$ obtained (in the solvable case) in this way is independent of the choice of the polarization [[#References|[a7]]], hence this ideal may be denoted by $I ( f )$. The ideal $I ( f )$ is a (left) primitive ideal, i.e. the annihilator of an irreducible representation (left module) of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$. It is known that for enveloping algebras of Lie algebras, left and right primitive ideals coincide (see [[#References|[a7]]] in the solvable case and [[#References|[a14]]] in the general case). It should be noted that for solvable Lie algebras $\frak g$ all prime ideals (hence especially all primitive ideals) of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ are completely prime [[#References|[a7]]].
  
For solvable Lie algebras <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024061.png" />, the Dixmier mapping associates to a linear form <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024062.png" /> of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024063.png" /> this primitive ideal <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024064.png" />. The <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024065.png" />-equivariance follows immediately from the fact that this construction commutes with automorphisms of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024066.png" />. For a general description and references, see [[#References|[a3]]] and [[#References|[a8]]].
+
For solvable Lie algebras $\frak g$, the Dixmier mapping associates to a linear form $f$ of $\frak g$ this primitive ideal $I ( f )$. The $G$-equivariance follows immediately from the fact that this construction commutes with automorphisms of $\frak g$. For a general description and references, see [[#References|[a3]]] and [[#References|[a8]]].
  
 
The definition has been extended in several directions:
 
The definition has been extended in several directions:
  
1) To the Dixmier–Duflo mapping [[#References|[a10]]], defined for all Lie algebras <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024067.png" /> but only on the set of elements of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024068.png" /> having a solvable polarization. In particular, this set contains the open set of linear forms whose orbits under <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024069.png" /> have maximal dimension. For solvable Lie algebras one gets the usual definition.
+
1) To the Dixmier–Duflo mapping [[#References|[a10]]], defined for all Lie algebras $\frak g$ but only on the set of elements of $\mathfrak{g} ^ { * }$ having a solvable polarization. In particular, this set contains the open set of linear forms whose orbits under $G$ have maximal dimension. For solvable Lie algebras one gets the usual definition.
  
2) To the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024071.png" />-parameter Duflo mapping [[#References|[a11]]]. This mapping is defined for algebraic Lie algebras <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024072.png" /> (cf. also [[Lie algebra, algebraic|Lie algebra, algebraic]]). The first parameter is a so-called linear form on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024073.png" /> of unipotent type, the second parameter is a primitive ideal in the reductive part of the stabilizer in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024074.png" /> of the first parameter. The mapping goes into the space of primitive ideals of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024075.png" />. This mapping coincides with the Dixmier mapping if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024076.png" /> is nilpotent and it can be related to the Dixmier mapping if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024077.png" /> is algebraic and solvable. For <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024078.png" /> semi-simple, the mapping reduces to the identity. This <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024079.png" />-parameter Duflo mapping is surjective [[#References|[a11]]] and it is injective modulo the operation of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024080.png" /> [[#References|[a16]]].
+
2) To the $2$-parameter Duflo mapping [[#References|[a11]]]. This mapping is defined for algebraic Lie algebras $\frak g$ (cf. also [[Lie algebra, algebraic|Lie algebra, algebraic]]). The first parameter is a so-called linear form on $\frak g$ of unipotent type, the second parameter is a primitive ideal in the reductive part of the stabilizer in $\frak g$ of the first parameter. The mapping goes into the space of primitive ideals of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$. This mapping coincides with the Dixmier mapping if $\frak g$ is nilpotent and it can be related to the Dixmier mapping if $\frak g$ is algebraic and solvable. For $\frak g$ semi-simple, the mapping reduces to the identity. This $2$-parameter Duflo mapping is surjective [[#References|[a11]]] and it is injective modulo the operation of $G$ [[#References|[a16]]].
  
3) The Dixmier mapping for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024081.png" />. This was done by W. Borho, using the above Dixmier procedure [[#References|[a1]]]. The problem is its being well-defined. Because of the twist in the induction, this Dixmier mapping for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024082.png" /> (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024083.png" />) is continuous only on sheets of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024084.png" /> but not as mapping in the whole. The sheets of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024085.png" /> are the maximal irreducible subsets of the space of linear forms whose <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024086.png" />-orbits have a fixed dimension. The Dixmier mapping for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024087.png" /> is surjective on the space of primitive completely prime ideals of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024088.png" /> [[#References|[a15]]] and it is injective modulo <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024089.png" /> [[#References|[a4]]].
+
3) The Dixmier mapping for ${\frak sl} ( n )$. This was done by W. Borho, using the above Dixmier procedure [[#References|[a1]]]. The problem is its being well-defined. Because of the twist in the induction, this Dixmier mapping for ${\frak sl} ( n )$ ($= \mathfrak { g }$) is continuous only on sheets of $\mathfrak{g} ^ { * }$ but not as mapping in the whole. The sheets of $\mathfrak{g} ^ { * }$ are the maximal irreducible subsets of the space of linear forms whose $G$-orbits have a fixed dimension. The Dixmier mapping for ${\frak sl} ( n )$ is surjective on the space of primitive completely prime ideals of $U ( \mathfrak { sl } ( n ) )$ [[#References|[a15]]] and it is injective modulo $G$ [[#References|[a4]]].
  
4) The Dixmier mapping on polarizable sheets (sheets in which every element has a polarization) in the semi-simple case. This was done by W. Borho. This map is well-defined [[#References|[a2]]] and continuous, and it is conjectured to be injective modulo <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024090.png" /> (the conjecture is still open, October 1999).
+
4) The Dixmier mapping on polarizable sheets (sheets in which every element has a polarization) in the semi-simple case. This was done by W. Borho. This map is well-defined [[#References|[a2]]] and continuous, and it is conjectured to be injective modulo $G$ (the conjecture is still open, October 1999).
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. Borho,   "Definition einer Dixmier–Abbildung für <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024091.png" />"  ''Invent. Math.'' , '''40''' (1977) pp. 143–169 {{MR|442046}} {{ZBL|0346.17014}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. Borho,   "Extended central characters and Dixmier's map" ''J. Algebra'' , '''213''' (1999) pp. 155–166 {{MR|1674672}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. Borho,   P. Gabriel,   R. Rentschler,   "Primideale in Einhüllenden auflösbarer Lie–Algebren" , ''Lecture Notes Math.'' , '''357''' , Springer (1973) {{MR|}} {{ZBL|0293.17005}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. Borho,   J.C. Jantzen,   "Über primitive Ideale in der Einhüllenden einer halbeinfachen Lie-Algebra" ''Invent. Math.'' , '''39''' (1977) pp. 1–53 {{MR|0453826}} {{ZBL|0327.17002}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N. Conze,   M. Duflo,   "Sur l'algèbre enveloppante d'une algèbre de Lie résoluble" ''Bull. Sci. Math.'' , '''94''' (1970) pp. 201–208 {{MR|0283037}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Dixmier,   "Représentations irréductibles des algèbres de Lie nilpotents" ''An. Acad. Brasil. Ci.'' , '''35''' (1963) pp. 491–519 {{MR|}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Dixmier,   "Representations irreductibles des algebres de Lie résolubles" ''J. Math. Pures Appl.'' , '''45''' (1966) pp. 1–66 {{MR|0200393}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Dixmier,   "Enveloping algebras" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1996) (Translated from French) {{MR|1451138}} {{MR|1393197}} {{ZBL|0867.17001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a9]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Duflo,   "Sur les extensions des representations irreductibles des algèbres de Lie contenant un ideal nilpotent" ''C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. A'' , '''270''' (1970) pp. 504–506 {{MR|257160}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a10]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Duflo,   "Construction of primitive ideals in enveloping algebras" I.M. Gelfand (ed.) , ''Lie Groups and their representations: Summer School of the Bolyai Janos Math. Soc. (1971)'' , Akad. Kiado (1975) {{MR|399194}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a11]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Duflo,   "Théorie de Mackey pour les groupes de Lie algébriques" ''Acta Math.'' , '''149''' (1982) pp. 153–213 {{MR|0688348}} {{ZBL|0529.22011}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a12]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.A. Kirillov,   "Unitary representations of nilpotent Lie groups" ''Uspekhi Mat. Nauk'' , '''17''' (1962) pp. 57–110 (In Russian) {{MR|0142001}} {{ZBL|0106.25001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a13]</TD> <TD valign="top"> O. Mathieu,   "Bicontinuity of the Dixmier map" ''J. Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''4''' (1991) pp. 837–863 {{MR|1126380}} {{MR|1115787}} {{ZBL|0743.17013}} {{ZBL|0762.17008}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a14]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Moeglin,   "Ideaux primitifs des algèbres enveloppantes" ''J. Math. Pures Appl.'' , '''59''' (1980) pp. 265–336 {{MR|0604473}} {{ZBL|0454.17006}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a15]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Moeglin,   "Ideaux primitifs completement premiers de l'algèbre enveloppante de <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/d/d120/d120240/d12024092.png" />" ''J. Algebra'' , '''106''' (1987) pp. 287–366</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a16]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Moeglin,   R. Rentschler,   "Sur la classification des ideaux primitifs des algèbres enveloppantes" ''Bull. Soc. Math. France'' , '''112''' (1984) pp. 3–40 {{MR|0771917}} {{ZBL|0549.17007}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a17]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Rentschler,   "L'injectivite de l'application de Dixmier pour les algèebres de Lie résolubles" ''Invent. Math.'' , '''23''' (1974) pp. 49–71</TD></TR></table>
+
<table><tr><td valign="top">[a1]</td> <td valign="top"> W. Borho, "Definition einer Dixmier–Abbildung für ${\frak sl} ( n , {\bf C} )$" ''Invent. Math.'' , '''40''' (1977) pp. 143–169 {{MR|442046}} {{ZBL|0346.17014}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a2]</td> <td valign="top"> W. Borho, "Extended central characters and Dixmier's map" ''J. Algebra'' , '''213''' (1999) pp. 155–166 {{MR|1674672}} {{ZBL|}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a3]</td> <td valign="top"> W. Borho, P. Gabriel, R. Rentschler, "Primideale in Einhüllenden auflösbarer Lie–Algebren" , ''Lecture Notes Math.'' , '''357''' , Springer (1973) {{MR|}} {{ZBL|0293.17005}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a4]</td> <td valign="top"> W. Borho, J.C. Jantzen, "Über primitive Ideale in der Einhüllenden einer halbeinfachen Lie-Algebra" ''Invent. Math.'' , '''39''' (1977) pp. 1–53 {{MR|0453826}} {{ZBL|0327.17002}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a5]</td> <td valign="top"> N. Conze, M. Duflo, "Sur l'algèbre enveloppante d'une algèbre de Lie résoluble" ''Bull. Sci. Math.'' , '''94''' (1970) pp. 201–208 {{MR|0283037}} {{ZBL|}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a6]</td> <td valign="top"> J. Dixmier, "Représentations irréductibles des algèbres de Lie nilpotents" ''An. Acad. Brasil. Ci.'' , '''35''' (1963) pp. 491–519 {{MR|}} {{ZBL|}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a7]</td> <td valign="top"> J. Dixmier, "Representations irreductibles des algebres de Lie résolubles" ''J. Math. Pures Appl.'' , '''45''' (1966) pp. 1–66 {{MR|0200393}} {{ZBL|}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a8]</td> <td valign="top"> J. Dixmier, "Enveloping algebras" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1996) (Translated from French) {{MR|1451138}} {{MR|1393197}} {{ZBL|0867.17001}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a9]</td> <td valign="top"> M. Duflo, "Sur les extensions des representations irreductibles des algèbres de Lie contenant un ideal nilpotent" ''C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. A'' , '''270''' (1970) pp. 504–506 {{MR|257160}} {{ZBL|}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a10]</td> <td valign="top"> M. Duflo, "Construction of primitive ideals in enveloping algebras" I.M. Gelfand (ed.) , ''Lie Groups and their representations: Summer School of the Bolyai Janos Math. Soc. (1971)'' , Akad. Kiado (1975) {{MR|399194}} {{ZBL|}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a11]</td> <td valign="top"> M. Duflo, "Théorie de Mackey pour les groupes de Lie algébriques" ''Acta Math.'' , '''149''' (1982) pp. 153–213 {{MR|0688348}} {{ZBL|0529.22011}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a12]</td> <td valign="top"> A.A. Kirillov, "Unitary representations of nilpotent Lie groups" ''Uspekhi Mat. Nauk'' , '''17''' (1962) pp. 57–110 (In Russian) {{MR|0142001}} {{ZBL|0106.25001}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a13]</td> <td valign="top"> O. Mathieu, "Bicontinuity of the Dixmier map" ''J. Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''4''' (1991) pp. 837–863 {{MR|1126380}} {{MR|1115787}} {{ZBL|0743.17013}} {{ZBL|0762.17008}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a14]</td> <td valign="top"> C. Moeglin, "Ideaux primitifs des algèbres enveloppantes" ''J. Math. Pures Appl.'' , '''59''' (1980) pp. 265–336 {{MR|0604473}} {{ZBL|0454.17006}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a15]</td> <td valign="top"> C. Moeglin, "Ideaux primitifs completement premiers de l'algèbre enveloppante de ${\frak gl} ( n , {\bf C} )$" ''J. Algebra'' , '''106''' (1987) pp. 287–366 {{MR|}} {{ZBL|}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a16]</td> <td valign="top"> C. Moeglin, R. Rentschler, "Sur la classification des ideaux primitifs des algèbres enveloppantes" ''Bull. Soc. Math. France'' , '''112''' (1984) pp. 3–40 {{MR|0771917}} {{ZBL|0549.17007}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a17]</td> <td valign="top"> R. Rentschler, "L'injectivite de l'application de Dixmier pour les algèebres de Lie résolubles" ''Invent. Math.'' , '''23''' (1974) pp. 49–71 {{MR|}} {{ZBL|}} </td></tr></table>

Latest revision as of 17:02, 1 July 2020

Dixmier map

A mapping first defined for nilpotent Lie algebras by J. Dixmier in 1963 [a6], based on the orbit method of A.A. Kirillov [a12]. In 1966, Dixmier extended his definition to solvable Lie algebras [a7] (here and below, all Lie algebras are of finite dimension over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, cf. also Lie algebra; Lie algebra, solvable).

The Dixmier mapping is an equivariant mapping with respect to the adjoint algebraic group $G$ from the dual space $\mathfrak{g} ^ { * }$ of a solvable Lie algebra $\frak g$ into the space of primitive ideals of the enveloping algebra $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ of $\frak g$ (cf. also Universal enveloping algebra; the adjoint algebraic group $G$ of $\frak g$ is the smallest algebraic subgroup of the group of automorphisms of the Lie algebra $\frak g$ whose Lie algebra in the algebra of endomorphisms of $\frak g$ contains the adjoint Lie algebra of $\frak g$). All ideals of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ are stable under the action of $G$.

The properties of the Dixmier mapping have been studied in detail. In particular, the Dixmier mapping allows one to describe (the) primitive ideals of the enveloping algebra $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ and to describe the centre of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$.

The dual $\mathfrak{g} ^ { * }$ of $\frak g$ is equipped with the Zariski topology and the space of primitive ideals of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ with the Jacobson topology.

The Dixmier mapping (for $\frak g$ solvable) is surjective [a9], injective (modulo the action of the adjoint algebraic group $G$) [a17], continuous [a5], and even open [a13].

Hence the Dixmier mapping induces a homeomorphism between $\mathfrak { g } ^ { * } / G$ and the space $\operatorname{Prim}( U ( \mathfrak{g} ) )$ of primitive ideals of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ and allows a complete classification of the primitive ideals of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$. The openness was an open question for quite a long while.

The Dixmier construction goes as follows: If $f$ is a linear form on the Lie algebra $\frak g$, one chooses a subalgebra $\mathfrak h $ of $\frak g$ which is a polarization of $f$. This means that the subalgebra $\mathfrak h $ is an isotropic subspace of maximal dimension for the skew-symmetric bilinear form $f ( [ \cdot , \cdot ] )$ (on $\frak g$); hence the dimension of $\mathfrak h $ is one half of $\operatorname { dim } \mathfrak { g } - \operatorname { dim } \mathfrak { g } ( f )$, where $\mathfrak { g } ( f )$ is the stabilizer of $f$ in $\frak g$ with respect to the co-adjoint action of $\frak g$ in $\mathfrak{g} ^ { * }$.

For solvable Lie algebras such polarizations always exist, whereas for arbitrary Lie algebras this is, in general, not the case. Let $\operatorname{tr}$ denote the linear form on $\mathfrak h $ defined as the trace of the adjoint action of $\mathfrak h $ in $\mathfrak{g}/\mathfrak{h}$. The linear form $f + 1 / 2 \operatorname{tr}$ on $\mathfrak h $ defines a one-dimensional representation of the enveloping algebra $U ( \mathfrak{h} )$. Let $J$ denote its kernel and $I ( f , \mathfrak{h} )$ the largest two-sided ideal in $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ contained in $U ( {\frak g} ) J$. This is nothing else but the kernel of the so-called twisted induction from $U ( \mathfrak{h} )$ to $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ of the one-dimensional representation of $U ( \mathfrak{h} )$ given by $f$. In the case of a nilpotent Lie algebra, the twist $1 / 2 \operatorname{tr}$ is zero. The twisted induction on the level of enveloping algebras corresponds to the unitary induction on the level of Lie groups.

The ideal $I ( f , \mathfrak{h} )$ obtained (in the solvable case) in this way is independent of the choice of the polarization [a7], hence this ideal may be denoted by $I ( f )$. The ideal $I ( f )$ is a (left) primitive ideal, i.e. the annihilator of an irreducible representation (left module) of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$. It is known that for enveloping algebras of Lie algebras, left and right primitive ideals coincide (see [a7] in the solvable case and [a14] in the general case). It should be noted that for solvable Lie algebras $\frak g$ all prime ideals (hence especially all primitive ideals) of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$ are completely prime [a7].

For solvable Lie algebras $\frak g$, the Dixmier mapping associates to a linear form $f$ of $\frak g$ this primitive ideal $I ( f )$. The $G$-equivariance follows immediately from the fact that this construction commutes with automorphisms of $\frak g$. For a general description and references, see [a3] and [a8].

The definition has been extended in several directions:

1) To the Dixmier–Duflo mapping [a10], defined for all Lie algebras $\frak g$ but only on the set of elements of $\mathfrak{g} ^ { * }$ having a solvable polarization. In particular, this set contains the open set of linear forms whose orbits under $G$ have maximal dimension. For solvable Lie algebras one gets the usual definition.

2) To the $2$-parameter Duflo mapping [a11]. This mapping is defined for algebraic Lie algebras $\frak g$ (cf. also Lie algebra, algebraic). The first parameter is a so-called linear form on $\frak g$ of unipotent type, the second parameter is a primitive ideal in the reductive part of the stabilizer in $\frak g$ of the first parameter. The mapping goes into the space of primitive ideals of $U ( \mathfrak { g } )$. This mapping coincides with the Dixmier mapping if $\frak g$ is nilpotent and it can be related to the Dixmier mapping if $\frak g$ is algebraic and solvable. For $\frak g$ semi-simple, the mapping reduces to the identity. This $2$-parameter Duflo mapping is surjective [a11] and it is injective modulo the operation of $G$ [a16].

3) The Dixmier mapping for ${\frak sl} ( n )$. This was done by W. Borho, using the above Dixmier procedure [a1]. The problem is its being well-defined. Because of the twist in the induction, this Dixmier mapping for ${\frak sl} ( n )$ ($= \mathfrak { g }$) is continuous only on sheets of $\mathfrak{g} ^ { * }$ but not as mapping in the whole. The sheets of $\mathfrak{g} ^ { * }$ are the maximal irreducible subsets of the space of linear forms whose $G$-orbits have a fixed dimension. The Dixmier mapping for ${\frak sl} ( n )$ is surjective on the space of primitive completely prime ideals of $U ( \mathfrak { sl } ( n ) )$ [a15] and it is injective modulo $G$ [a4].

4) The Dixmier mapping on polarizable sheets (sheets in which every element has a polarization) in the semi-simple case. This was done by W. Borho. This map is well-defined [a2] and continuous, and it is conjectured to be injective modulo $G$ (the conjecture is still open, October 1999).

References

[a1] W. Borho, "Definition einer Dixmier–Abbildung für ${\frak sl} ( n , {\bf C} )$" Invent. Math. , 40 (1977) pp. 143–169 MR442046 Zbl 0346.17014
[a2] W. Borho, "Extended central characters and Dixmier's map" J. Algebra , 213 (1999) pp. 155–166 MR1674672
[a3] W. Borho, P. Gabriel, R. Rentschler, "Primideale in Einhüllenden auflösbarer Lie–Algebren" , Lecture Notes Math. , 357 , Springer (1973) Zbl 0293.17005
[a4] W. Borho, J.C. Jantzen, "Über primitive Ideale in der Einhüllenden einer halbeinfachen Lie-Algebra" Invent. Math. , 39 (1977) pp. 1–53 MR0453826 Zbl 0327.17002
[a5] N. Conze, M. Duflo, "Sur l'algèbre enveloppante d'une algèbre de Lie résoluble" Bull. Sci. Math. , 94 (1970) pp. 201–208 MR0283037
[a6] J. Dixmier, "Représentations irréductibles des algèbres de Lie nilpotents" An. Acad. Brasil. Ci. , 35 (1963) pp. 491–519
[a7] J. Dixmier, "Representations irreductibles des algebres de Lie résolubles" J. Math. Pures Appl. , 45 (1966) pp. 1–66 MR0200393
[a8] J. Dixmier, "Enveloping algebras" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1996) (Translated from French) MR1451138 MR1393197 Zbl 0867.17001
[a9] M. Duflo, "Sur les extensions des representations irreductibles des algèbres de Lie contenant un ideal nilpotent" C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. A , 270 (1970) pp. 504–506 MR257160
[a10] M. Duflo, "Construction of primitive ideals in enveloping algebras" I.M. Gelfand (ed.) , Lie Groups and their representations: Summer School of the Bolyai Janos Math. Soc. (1971) , Akad. Kiado (1975) MR399194
[a11] M. Duflo, "Théorie de Mackey pour les groupes de Lie algébriques" Acta Math. , 149 (1982) pp. 153–213 MR0688348 Zbl 0529.22011
[a12] A.A. Kirillov, "Unitary representations of nilpotent Lie groups" Uspekhi Mat. Nauk , 17 (1962) pp. 57–110 (In Russian) MR0142001 Zbl 0106.25001
[a13] O. Mathieu, "Bicontinuity of the Dixmier map" J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 4 (1991) pp. 837–863 MR1126380 MR1115787 Zbl 0743.17013 Zbl 0762.17008
[a14] C. Moeglin, "Ideaux primitifs des algèbres enveloppantes" J. Math. Pures Appl. , 59 (1980) pp. 265–336 MR0604473 Zbl 0454.17006
[a15] C. Moeglin, "Ideaux primitifs completement premiers de l'algèbre enveloppante de ${\frak gl} ( n , {\bf C} )$" J. Algebra , 106 (1987) pp. 287–366
[a16] C. Moeglin, R. Rentschler, "Sur la classification des ideaux primitifs des algèbres enveloppantes" Bull. Soc. Math. France , 112 (1984) pp. 3–40 MR0771917 Zbl 0549.17007
[a17] R. Rentschler, "L'injectivite de l'application de Dixmier pour les algèebres de Lie résolubles" Invent. Math. , 23 (1974) pp. 49–71
How to Cite This Entry:
Dixmier mapping. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Dixmier_mapping&oldid=21840
This article was adapted from an original article by R. Rentschler (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article