Post TeX notes
- The original article seems to be broken, in several places one has "see , ." where the lacunae are obviously references. To make these clear I have replaced them with "[REF]"
- The last line does not make any sense -- there are no Theorems 1), 2), 3) in the article
I'm not sure whether these errors are in the original paper version of the EoM, could someone with a copy have a look fill in the gaps (or comment here to say this need rewriting)
Fatou theorem. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Fatou_theorem&oldid=27215